¿Cómo no había visto esto antes? Un simple y eficaz generador de caca de la vaca, utilísimo para el mundo empresarial:
(el botón GO aquí no funciona, es una aplicación flash y hay que ir a la página original).
He encontrado otro generador similar y uno especializado en bullshit 2.0. Están bien, pero ninguno se acerca al venerable Posmodern Generator, que proporciona un ensayo posmoderno cada vez que se recarga la página. Por ejemplo:
Dialectic discourse in the works of Burroughs
Department of Peace Studies, Stanford University
1. Dialectic discourse and the posttextual paradigm of consensus
In the works of Burroughs, a predominant concept is the concept of semiotic truth. A number of deconstructions concerning not narrative, but prenarrative exist.
The characteristic theme of the works of Burroughs is a mythopoetical whole. Therefore, the subject is contextualised into a that includes narrativity as a paradox. Drucker states that we have to choose between dialectic discourse and capitalist desituationism.
Thus, any number of narratives concerning the posttextual paradigm of consensus may be revealed. Debord uses the term ‘dialectic discourse’ to denote the meaninglessness, and some would say the collapse, of subdeconstructive consciousness.
However, the subject is interpolated into a posttextual paradigm of consensus that includes reality as a whole. Baudrillardist simulation holds that truth may be used to marginalize minorities, but only if art is distinct from consciousness.
It could be said that several desublimations concerning a cultural reality exist. Foucault’s model of the posttextual paradigm of consensus states that sexuality is capable of truth.
Therefore, the primary theme of Humphrey’s critique of Baudrillardist simulation is the dialectic, and eventually the economy, of precapitalist sexual identity. The premise of the posttextual paradigm of consensus suggests that the task of the writer is significant form, given that Sontag’s analysis of Baudrillardist simulation is invalid.
2. Discourses of failure
If one examines dialectic discourse, one is faced with a choice: either accept the posttextual paradigm of consensus or conclude that class has objective value. However, a number of situationisms concerning Baudrillardist simulation may be discovered. If Sartreist existentialism holds, we have to choose between Baudrillardist simulation and cultural postcapitalist theory.
It could be said that the subject is contextualised into a that includes language as a whole. An abundance of deconstructions concerning the difference between narrativity and sexual identity exist.
But the subject is interpolated into a cultural paradigm of context that includes truth as a reality. In Mason & Dixon, Pynchon affirms the posttextual paradigm of consensus; in The Crying of Lot 49, however, he deconstructs dialectic discourse.
* * *
El generador posmoderno tiene ya muchos años; su origen se remonta a un trabajo de Andrew C. Bulhak, un informático australiano, que se publicó en 1996 con el delicioso título de On the Simulation of Postmodernism and Mental Debility using Recursive Transition Networks. Creo que antes generaba ensayos más largos, pero a lo mejor la memoria me falla.